Pakistan Approves 27th Constitutional Amendment with Key Legal Reforms

The 27th Constitutional Amendment Pakistan strengthens the country’s legal and judicial system. Lawmakers in the National Assembly approved the amendment with a two-thirds majority after heated debates and strong opposition protests.

Senate to Review Amendment

The Senate will review the 27th Constitutional Amendment Pakistan in its session today. Government officials aim to complete the approval process soon.

Later today, the federal cabinet will also meet to finalize related legal changes. Ministers are expected to align national laws with the new constitutional reforms.

Opposition Protests During Assembly Session

During the voting session, opposition lawmakers protested and tore copies of the bill. Despite their resistance, the government secured 234 votes, exceeding the 224 required for approval.

Members of JUI-F opposed the bill and walked out in protest. Government representatives praised the outcome, calling it a victory for democracy and rule of law.

Major Changes in the 27th Amendment

The 27th Constitutional Amendment introduces eight key changes to Pakistan’s Constitution, focusing on judicial structure and accountability.

Updates to Article 6, Clause 2

The amendment revises Article 6, Clause 2 to state that acts of high treason cannot receive validation from any court. It also adds the Constitutional Court alongside the High Court and Supreme Court, broadening judicial authority.

Role of the Chief Justice of Pakistan

Under the new amendment, the current Chief Justice will continue to serve until completing their term. Afterward, the senior-most judge among the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and the Chief Justice of the Federal Constitutional Court will take charge.

Importance of the 27th Constitutional Amendment

The 27th Constitutional Amendment Pakistan aims to enhance judicial independence and strengthen constitutional governance. Legal experts believe it will reduce misuse of power and promote transparency.

The government views the reform as a major step toward stability and justice, while the opposition continues to question its timing and execution.